PFIZER INC | 2013 | FY | 3


The following table provides the annual cost (including costs reported as part of discontinued operations) and changes in Other comprehensive income/(loss) for our benefit plans:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
Pension Plans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.
Qualified(a)
 
U.S.
Supplemental
(Non-Qualified)(b)
 
International(c)
 
Postretirement
Plans(d)
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Service cost
 
$
301

 
$
357

 
$
351

 
$
26

 
$
35

 
$
36

 
$
216

 
$
215

 
$
243

 
$
61

 
$
68

 
$
68

Interest cost
 
666

 
697

 
734

 
67

 
62

 
72

 
378

 
406

 
443

 
166

 
182

 
195

Expected return on plan assets
 
(999
)
 
(983
)
 
(871
)
 

 

 

 
(407
)
 
(424
)
 
(437
)
 
(55
)
 
(46
)
 
(35
)
Amortization of:
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
Actuarial losses
 
355

 
306

 
145

 
51

 
41

 
36

 
129

 
93

 
86

 
46

 
33

 
17

Prior service credits
 
(7
)
 
(10
)
 
(8
)
 
(2
)
 
(3
)
 
(3
)
 
(5
)
 
(7
)
 
(5
)
 
(44
)
 
(49
)
 
(53
)
Curtailments
 

 
(62
)
 
(4
)
 

 
(9
)
 
(1
)
 
(20
)
 
(16
)
 
(14
)
 
(11
)
 
(65
)
 
(68
)
Settlements
 
113

 
145

 
99

 
40

 
33

 
24

 
22

 
7

 
14

 

 

 

Special termination benefits
 

 
8

 
23

 

 
30

 
26

 
4

 
5

 
5

 

 
6

 
3

Net periodic benefit costs reported in Income
 
429

 
458

 
469

 
182

 
189

 
190

 
317

 
279

 
335

 
163

 
129

 
127

(Income)/cost reported in Other comprehensive income/(loss)
 
(3,044
)
 
461

 
1,879

 
(255
)
 
110

 
36

 
(569
)
 
759

 
(365
)
 
(736
)
 
267

 
421

(Income)/cost recognized in Comprehensive income
 
$
(2,615
)
 
$
919

 
$
2,348

 
$
(73
)
 
$
299

 
$
226

 
$
(252
)
 
$
1,038

 
$
(30
)
 
$
(573
)
 
$
396

 
$
548


(a) 
2013 v. 2012––The decrease in net periodic benefit cost for our U.S. qualified plans was primarily driven by (i) lower service cost resulting from cost reduction initiatives, (ii) lower settlements and (iii) higher expected return on plan assets resulting from an increased plan asset base partially offset by the curtailment gain in the second quarter of 2012 resulting from the decision to freeze the defined benefit plans in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. Also, the decrease in the discount rate resulted in lower interest costs, as well as an increase in the amounts amortized for actuarial losses. 2012 v. 2011––The decrease in net periodic benefit cost for our U.S. qualified plans was primarily driven by (i) higher expected return on plan assets (resulting from contributions made to the plan in 2011 that increased the plan asset base), (ii) lower interest costs, (iii) a decrease in special termination benefits, and (iv) higher curtailments resulting from the decision to freeze the defined benefit plans in the U.S. and Puerto Rico largely offset by higher settlements and an increase in the amounts amortized for actuarial losses (resulting from a decrease in the discount rate and lower than expected actual returns in 2011).
(b) 
2013 v. 2012––The decrease in net periodic benefit cost for our U.S. supplemental (non-qualified) pension plans was primarily driven by special termination benefits in 2012, partially offset by an increase in the amounts amortized for actuarial losses resulting from a decrease in the discount rate, and the curtailment gain in the second quarter of 2012 resulting from the decision to freeze the defined benefit plans in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. 2012 v. 2011––The net periodic benefit cost for our U.S. supplemental (non-qualified) pension plans was largely unchanged as the curtailment gain resulting from the decision to freeze the defined benefit plans in the U.S. and Puerto Rico was more than offset by higher settlement activity.
(c) 
2013 v. 2012––The increase in net periodic benefit costs for our international pension plans was primarily driven by (i) an increase in the amounts amortized for actuarial losses resulting from changes in assumptions, (ii) lower expected return on plan assets driven by lower expected rate of return in certain significant plans, (iii) higher settlements and (iv) 2012 curtailment gains, partially offset by lower interest costs resulting from the decrease in discount rates. 2012 v. 2011––The decrease in net periodic benefit costs for our international pension plans was primarily driven by restructuring activities in the U.K. and Ireland in 2011. Also, the decrease in discount rates resulted in lower interest costs, as well as an increase in the amounts amortized for actuarial losses.
(d) 
2013 v. 2012––The increase in net periodic benefit cost for our postretirement plans was primarily driven by 2012 curtailment gains, partially offset by higher expected return on plan assets and 2012 special termination benefits. Also, the decrease in the discount rate resulted in lower interest costs, as well as an increase in the amounts amortized for actuarial losses. 2012 v. 2011––The net periodic benefit cost for our postretirement plans was largely unchanged, as an increase in amounts amortized for actuarial plan losses was partially offset by higher expected return on plan assets.

us-gaap:ScheduleOfNetBenefitCostsTableTextBlock